Baldwin v. Mayne
This text of 40 Iowa 687 (Baldwin v. Mayne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Certain depositions taken in this case by plaintiff were suppressed upon the motion of defendant, on the ground that they were taken from the clerk’s office by plaintiff’s attorney, contrary to the provisions of Code § 3739. From this order plaintiff appeals. There has been no trial or final judgment in the case, which is yet pending. The defendant moves to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that upon rulings of the kind complained of no appeal lies.
We have held that a.n appeal cannot be taken from the decision of an inferior court, upon the admissibility of evidence. Richards v. Burden, 29 Iowa, 305. The order appealed from is of that character. The appeal must therefore be
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 Iowa 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-mayne-iowa-1875.