Baldwin v. Idoni

208 So. 3d 842, 2017 WL 378591, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 846
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 27, 2017·No. Case No. 5D15-2933·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant John Baldwin appeals the order denying his motion for attorney’s fees and costs. The trial court denied the motion, concluding that the case was an action for equitable relief. We disagree. The essence of the suit was an action for damages. See DiPompeo Constr. Corp. v. Kimmel & Assocs., Inc., 916 So.2d 17, 19 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Therefore, the trial court erred in denying the motion. Thus, we reverse the order under review and remand with instructions to determine the amount of attorney’s fees to which Baldwin is entitled pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes (2015).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SAWAYA and EDWARDS, JJ. and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldwin v. Idoni, 208 So. 3d 842, 2017 WL 378591, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 846 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

208 So. 3d 842 (Baldwin v. Idoni) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DiPompeo Construction Corp. v. Kimmel & Associates, Inc.
916 So. 2d 17 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)