Baldwin v. Idoni
944 So. 2d 426, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18738, 2006 WL 3228613
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 9, 2006
DocketNo. 5D06-1474
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 944 So. 2d 426 (Baldwin v. Idoni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Baldwin v. Idoni, 944 So. 2d 426, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18738, 2006 WL 3228613 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s temporary order. Where there was a legitimate dispute as to the ownership of the vehicle, the trial court had the inherent authority to grant an injunction so as to preserve the property until a final resolution of the case. McRae v. McRae, 52 So.2d 908, 910 (Fla.1951).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gibson v. State
944 So. 2d 426 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
944 So. 2d 426, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18738, 2006 WL 3228613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-idoni-fladistctapp-2006.