Baldwin v. Idoni
944 So. 2d 426, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18738, 2006 WL 3228613
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 9, 2006·No. No. 5D06-1474·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s temporary order. Where there was a legitimate dispute as to the ownership of the vehicle, the trial court had the inherent authority to grant an injunction so as to preserve the property until a final resolution of the case. McRae v. McRae, 52 So.2d 908, 910 (Fla.1951).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baldwin v. Idoni, 944 So. 2d 426, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18738, 2006 WL 3228613 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
944 So. 2d 426 (Baldwin v. Idoni) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gibson v. State
944 So. 2d 426 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)