Home/New Jersey Superior Court App Division/Baldwin v. DIV. OF TAXATION

Baldwin v. DIV. OF TAXATION

567 A.2d 1021, 237 N.J. Super. 327
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedJanuary 2, 1990
StatusPublished

This text of 567 A.2d 1021 (Baldwin v. DIV. OF TAXATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baldwin v. DIV. OF TAXATION, 567 A.2d 1021, 237 N.J. Super. 327 (N.J. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

237 N.J. Super. 327 (1990)
567 A.2d 1021

ROBERT R. BALDWIN AND CAROL A. BALDWIN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 19, 1989.
Decided January 2, 1990.

Before Judges ANTELL, BILDER and ASHBEY.

Julian F. Gorelli, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Peter N. Perretti, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Michael R. Clancy, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Julian F. Gorelli, on the brief).

Respondents argued the cause pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment presented for review is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Andrew for the Tax Court which is published at 10 N.J. Tax 273 (Tax Ct. 1988).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baldwin v. Division of Taxation
567 A.2d 1021 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1990)
Baldwin v. Director, Division of Taxation
10 N.J. Tax 273 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
567 A.2d 1021, 237 N.J. Super. 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-div-of-taxation-njsuperctappdiv-1990.