Baldwin v. DIV. OF TAXATION
567 A.2d 1021, 237 N.J. Super. 327
Opinion
ROBERT R. BALDWIN AND CAROL A. BALDWIN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges ANTELL, BILDER and ASHBEY.
Julian F. Gorelli, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Peter N. Perretti, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Michael R. Clancy, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Julian F. Gorelli, on the brief).
Respondents argued the cause pro se.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment presented for review is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Andrew for the Tax Court which is published at 10 N.J. Tax 273 (Tax Ct. 1988).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baldwin v. DIV. OF TAXATION, 567 A.2d 1021, 237 N.J. Super. 327 (N.J. Ct. App. 1990).
567 A.2d 1021 (Baldwin v. DIV. OF TAXATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baldwin v. Division of Taxation
567 A.2d 1021 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1990)
Baldwin v. Director, Division of Taxation
10 N.J. Tax 273 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1988)