Baldwin v. DFS
This text of Baldwin v. DFS (Baldwin v. DFS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
DANIEL BALDWIN,1 § § No. 79, 2017 Respondent Below, § Appellant, § § Court Below: Family Court of the v. § State of Delaware § DIVISION OF FAMILY SERVICES, § File Nos. 16-12-02 TN, § CN15-06524 Petitioner Below, § Pet. Nos. 16-36945, Appellee. § 15-37830
Submitted: November 1, 2017 Decided: November 1, 2017
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
This 1st day of November 2017, upon consideration of the parties’ briefs and
the record below, it appears to the Court that the judgment of the Family Court
should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned in its thorough
decision dated January 23, 2017 terminating the parental rights of the appellants.2
1 By order dated February 23, 2017, the Court ordered assigned a pseudonym for the captions in this appeal under Supreme Court Rule 7(d). 2 Div. Family Servs. v. Daniel Baldwin, No. 16-12-02TN (Del. Fam. Ct. Jan. 23, 2017). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family
Court is hereby AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT: /s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr. Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Baldwin v. DFS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-dfs-del-2017.