Baldwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs
This text of Baldwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs (Baldwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
BRYAN D. BALDWIN, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent. ____________________
2010-3131 ______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in Case No. CH0752080238-C-1. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
DALE L. INGRAM, Law Offices of Dale L. Ingram, P.C., of Kansas City, Missouri, argued for petitioner.
ELIZABETH M. HOSFORD, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were TONY WEST, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, and BRIAN M. SIMKIN, Assistant Director. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, GAJARSA, and PROST, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 21, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Baldwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-department-of-veterans-affairs-cafc-2011.