Baldwin v. Darst

Supreme Court of Virginia

Baldwin v. Darst

3 Va. 132

DecidedJuly 15, 1846

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Va. 132 (Baldwin v. Darst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baldwin v. Darst, 3 Va. 132 (Va. 1846).

Pincite

Opinion

Cabell, P.

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Court is of opinion that the Court below erred in not dissolving the injunction, at the first hearing of motion made for that purpose, and also in continu¡ng the injunction till the termination of the lease, and then dissolving it at the costs of the appellant; this Court being clearly of opinion that the injunction ought never to have been granted. The decree is therefore reversed with costs; and this Court proceeding to pronounce such decree as the Court below ought to have pronounced, it is adjudged, ordered and decreed, that the injunction be dissolved, and the bill dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cabell, P.

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Court is of opinion that the Court below erred in not dissolving the injunction, at the first hearing of motion made for that purpose, and also in continu¡ng the injunction till the termination of the lease, and then dissolving it at the costs of the appellant; this Court being clearly of opinion that the injunction ought never to have been granted. The decree is therefore reversed with costs; and this Court proceeding to pronounce such decree as the Court below ought to have pronounced, it is adjudged, ordered and decreed, that the injunction be dissolved, and the bill dismissed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Va. 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-darst-va-1846.