Baldwin v. Coveney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baldwin v. Coveney

83 A.D.2d 890, 443 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15291

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 27, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 83 A.D.2d 890 (Baldwin v. Coveney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baldwin v. Coveney, 83 A.D.2d 890, 443 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15291 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

In proceedings to (1) invalidate petitions designating Anthony Pace and Harold Ferguson as candidates in the Republican Party Primary Election to be held on September 10, 1981 for the party position of County Committeeman from the 43rd Election District, Islip, New York, and (2) validate said petitions, the appeals are from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.), dated August 17,1981, which granted the application to validate the petitions, denied the application to invalidate said petitions and held that Sarah Lee Baldwin would be “a candidate aggrieved [891]*891within the meaning of Election Law § 16-102” if she is validated as a candidate in the 1st Election District. Cross appeal by Anthony Pace and Harold Ferguson dismissed, without prejudice, without costs or disbursements. It is not necessary at this time to pass upon the issue raised by Anthony Pace and Harold Ferguson on their cross appeal. Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, by Sarah Lee Baldwin, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In proceedings to (1) invalidate petitions designating Anthony Pace and Harold Ferguson as candidates in the Republican Party Primary Election to be held on September 10, 1981 for the party position of County Committeeman from the 43rd Election District, Islip, New York, and (2) validate said petitions, the appeals are from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.), dated August 17,1981, which granted the application to validate the petitions, denied the application to invalidate said petitions and held that Sarah Lee Baldwin would be “a candidate aggrieved [891]*891within the meaning of Election Law § 16-102” if she is validated as a candidate in the 1st Election District. Cross appeal by Anthony Pace and Harold Ferguson dismissed, without prejudice, without costs or disbursements. It is not necessary at this time to pass upon the issue raised by Anthony Pace and Harold Ferguson on their cross appeal. Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, by Sarah Lee Baldwin, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 A.D.2d 890, 443 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-coveney-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack