Baldwin v. Conrad

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Baldwin v. Conrad

572 So. 2d 1033, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 240, 1991 WL 3178

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 17, 1991

DocketNo. 90-1996

StatusPublished

This text of 572 So. 2d 1033 (Baldwin v. Conrad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baldwin v. Conrad, 572 So. 2d 1033, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 240, 1991 WL 3178 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Petitioner has sought this court’s writ of mandamus to require the circuit court judge to rule on his motion to correct sentence. Petitioner is entitled to have the trial judge rule, and the ruling should have occurred after due consideration upon receipt of the motion. We withhold issuance of the writ in full confidence that the trial judge will rule upon the motion upon receipt of this opinion.

It is so ordered.

COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Petitioner has sought this court’s writ of mandamus to require the circuit court judge to rule on his motion to correct sentence. Petitioner is entitled to have the trial judge rule, and the ruling should have occurred after due consideration upon receipt of the motion. We withhold issuance of the writ in full confidence that the trial judge will rule upon the motion upon receipt of this opinion.

It is so ordered.

COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

572 So. 2d 1033, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 240, 1991 WL 3178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-conrad-fladistctapp-1991.