Baldwin v. City of Dawson

151 S.E. 825, 41 Ga. App. 90, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 466
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 12, 1930·No. 19874·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

1. Under the constitution of the State of Georgia, “private property shall not be taken, or damaged, for public purposes, without just and adequate compensation being first paid.” Civil Code (1910), § 6388; City Council of Augusta v. Lamar, 37 Ga. App. 418 (140 S. E. 763).

2. In the instant case, where certain trees growing on a space between a sidewalk and street of the defendant municipality were, according to the allegations of the petition (which, on demurrer, must be taken as true), situated and growing on land owned by the plaintiff in fee ■ simple; and where such trees were, according to the allegations of the petition, cut down and removed by the municipality without the consent of the owner, a prima facie right of action arose in his favor for the damage thus sustained, and it was error for the court to sustain a general demurrer and dismiss his suit. City of Atlanta v. Holliday, 96 Ga. 546 (23 S. E. 509).

Judgment reversed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur. W. H. Chirr, for plaintiff. B. B. J ones, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldwin v. City of Dawson, 151 S.E. 825, 41 Ga. App. 90, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 466 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

151 S.E. 825 (Baldwin v. City of Dawson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Albany v. Lippitt
13 S.E.2d 807 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
City of Marietta v. Mozley
190 S.E. 34 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
McHan v. McHan
174 S.E. 336 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)