Baldwin v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.

81 N.W. 160, 109 Iowa 752
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedDecember 14, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 81 N.W. 160 (Baldwin v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baldwin v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co., 81 N.W. 160, 109 Iowa 752 (iowa 1899).

Opinion

Ladd, J.

In view of the condition of this record, we deem it advisable to pass on but one of the errors assigned. The plaintiff’s hand was caught, in attempting to make a coupling, between the ■ drawheads or bumpers of two freight cars. At the time he was holding the link, with his hand, between these, when, as he testified, the engine, without direction from him, moved slowly back. The rules • of the company prohibited placing the hand between the drawheads, and required the use of a stick in coupling. There was no evidence that either of these rules had been waived, and as they are not set • out, we refrain from expressing our opinion as to whether their violation was of itself negligence. If not so regarded, however, then whether the plaintiff, in placing the hand between the drawheads, holding the link without the stick, and in failing to observe the slow ■movement of the car, was guilty of negligence contributing to his •injury, was manifestly an issue for the determination of the jury, ..and in failing to submit it the court erred. — Reversed

Granger, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Andring v. Andring
211 N.E.2d 59 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1965)
Handy v. Handy
96 N.W.2d 922 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1959)
Hamburger v. Fry
1958 OK 287 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1958)
Simon v. Flowers
99 S.E.2d 391 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1957)
Jaggers v. Hobbs
1947 OK 8 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1947)
Leslie v. Spencer
1935 OK 212 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Scott v. Union Mutual Casualty Co.
252 N.W. 85 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1933)
Ferris v. Wulf
249 N.W. 156 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1933)
Peoples Finance & Thrift Co. v. Phoenix Assurance Co.
285 P. 857 (California Court of Appeal, 1930)
Bearman v. Bracken
1925 OK 839 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1925)
Boaz v. Martin
1924 OK 398 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
Anderson v. Graham
1922 OK 270 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1922)
Southwestern Surety Ins. v. Treadway
74 So. 143 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 N.W. 160, 109 Iowa 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-chicago-great-western-railway-co-iowa-1899.