Baldwin v. Campfield

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Baldwin v. Campfield

8 N.J. Eq. 600

DecidedFebruary 15, 1852

StatusPublished

This text of 8 N.J. Eq. 600 (Baldwin v. Campfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baldwin v. Campfield, 8 N.J. Eq. 600 (N.J. Ct. App. 1852).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor.

There can be no doubt, that the first deed from the complainant to the defendant, and the arrangement, at the sheriff’s sale, by which the property was struck off and conveyed to the defendant and the purchase money paid by the complainant, were both made for the fraudulent purpose of putting, or attempting to put, the property beyond the reach of the creditors of the complainant. No trust can result in favor of the complainant from such a transaction.

Bill dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor.

There can be no doubt, that the first deed from the complainant to the defendant, and the arrangement, at the sheriff’s sale, by which the property was struck off and conveyed to the defendant and the purchase money paid by the complainant, were both made for the fraudulent purpose of putting, or attempting to put, the property beyond the reach of the creditors of the complainant. No trust can result in favor of the complainant from such a transaction.

Bill dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 N.J. Eq. 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-campfield-njch-1852.