Baldwin v. Brogden
2 Stew. 9
Opinion
The plaintiff below should have replied to the plea of set off, thatthe note was given for a gambling consideration. This would have given sufficient notice to the defendant, and he could have been prepared to meet the objection, but it was surely improper to receive the testimony without such a replication
Judgment reversed and cause remanded
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baldwin v. Brogden, 2 Stew. 9 (Ala. 1829).
2 Stew. 9 (Baldwin v. Brogden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.