Baldwin v. Brethren Mutual Insurance

Fourth Circuit

Baldwin v. Brethren Mutual Insurance

474 F. App'x 929

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 14, 2012·No. No. 12-1298·Published

Opinion

[930] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Emily Baldwin appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging bad faith in connection with refusal to pay an insurance claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Baldwin v. Brethren Mut. Ins. Co., No. 1:10-cv-03227-RDB, 2012 WL 531009 (D.Md. Feb. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[930] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Emily Baldwin appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging bad faith in connection with refusal to pay an insurance claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Baldwin v. Brethren Mut. Ins. Co., No. 1:10-cv-03227-RDB, 2012 WL 531009 (D.Md. Feb. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Baldwin v. Brethren Mutual Insurance, 474 F. App'x 929 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

474 F. App'x 929 (Baldwin v. Brethren Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.