Baldwin v. Bowers
This text of 224 S.E.2d 494 (Baldwin v. Bowers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial judge did not err in dismissing the appellant’s petition for certiorari on the grounds that appellant was not the proper party to complain. Welborn v. Mize, 107 Ga. App. 427, 428 (130 SE2d 623). See also Gilliam v. Etheridge, 67 Ga. App. 731 (21 SE2d 556); Commissioners of Pilotage of St. Simons v. Tabbott, 72 Ga. 89 (2); Aldredge v. Rosser, 210 Ga. 28, 30 (1) (77 SE2d 515).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
224 S.E.2d 494, 137 Ga. App. 514, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-bowers-gactapp-1976.