Baldwin v. Board of Adjustment, City of East Orange
147 A. 907, 106 N.J.L. 230, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 169
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chibe Justice, Pabkeb, Kalisch, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, White, Van Buskiek, McG-lennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baldwin v. Board of Adjustment, City of East Orange, 147 A. 907, 106 N.J.L. 230, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 169 (N.J. 1929).
147 A. 907 (Baldwin v. Board of Adjustment, City of East Orange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.