Baldwin v. Board of Adjustment, City of East Orange
147 A. 907, 106 N.J.L. 230, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 169
This text of 147 A. 907 (Baldwin v. Board of Adjustment, City of East Orange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Baldwin v. Board of Adjustment, City of East Orange, 147 A. 907, 106 N.J.L. 230, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 169 (N.J. 1929).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chibe Justice, Pabkeb, Kalisch, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, White, Van Buskiek, McG-lennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
147 A. 907, 106 N.J.L. 230, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-board-of-adjustment-city-of-east-orange-nj-1929.