Baldwin v. Barnhart
This text of Baldwin v. Barnhart (Baldwin v. Barnhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1500
TIA S. BALDWIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (CA-03-171-7-FL)
Submitted: April 14, 2006 Decided: May 5, 2006
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Lee Davis, III, Lumberton, North Carolina, for Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, R. A. Renfer, Jr., Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Tia S. Baldwin appeals the district court’s order
accepting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and
affirming the Commissioner’s denial of Social Security benefits.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Baldwin v. Barnhart, No. CA-03-171-7-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 24, 2005).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Baldwin v. Barnhart, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-barnhart-ca4-2006.