Baldwin v. Bald
48 N.Y. 673
Opinion
Lott, Oh. G., reads for affirmance.
All concur, except Eael, C., dissenting. Judgment affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baldwin v. Bald, 48 N.Y. 673 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1872).
48 N.Y. 673 (Baldwin v. Bald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Werring v. Selig
241 A.D. 67 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
Schlicher v. Vogel
47 A. 448 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1900)
Finley v. Fay
24 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 67 (New York Supreme Court, 1879)