Baldwin v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

190 S.E. 465, 183 S.C. 66, 1937 S.C. LEXIS 94
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 2, 1937
Docket14442
StatusPublished

This text of 190 S.E. 465 (Baldwin v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baldwin v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad, 190 S.E. 465, 183 S.C. 66, 1937 S.C. LEXIS 94 (S.C. 1937).

Opinions

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fisi-iburne.

This cause was brought under the Federal Employers’ Biability Act (45 U. S. C. A., § 41 et seq.) for the recovery of damages for the suffering and death of Vernon Baldwin, a locomotive engineer, who at the time of his death was operating a passenger train for the defendant in interstate commerce, from Fayetteville, N. C., to Sumter, S. C., via Bennettsville, S. C. The engineer met his death when the train on which he was working ran into an open switch and was derailed, one mile and a half north of Bennettsville on December 2, 1933. The trial in the Circuit Court resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. Appeal was taken to this Court upon exceptions assigning error to the trial Judge because, of his refusal to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant.

An action was also brought against the defendant for the recovery of damages for the death of A. A. Wells, who was the fireman on this train, and who was killed in the same wreck. Rena Johnston, as Administratrix of the Estate of A. A. Wells, deceased, v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company (S. C.), 183 S. C., 126, 190 S. E., 459.

*68 Both cases involve the same testimony, present the same legal issues, and were argued together by agreement in the Supreme Court. The case at bar is controlled by the decision just filed in Rena Johnston, as Administratrix of the Estate of A. A. Wells, deceased, v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company.

Upon the authority of that case, the judgment of the Circuit Court in this case is reversed, and the cause remanded for entry of judgment in favor of the defendant under Rule 27.

Mr. Chief Justice Stabter and Mr. Justice Boni-iam concur. Mr. Justice Carter dissents. Mr. Justice Baker did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnston v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
190 S.E. 459 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 S.E. 465, 183 S.C. 66, 1937 S.C. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-atlantic-coast-line-railroad-sc-1937.