Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Baldwin-Nazarene v. Aramark Corp.

Baldwin-Nazarene v. Aramark Corp.

111 N.E.3d 1191, 2018 Ohio 4650, 154 Ohio St. 3d 1429
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 20, 2018
Docket2018-1362
StatusPublished

This text of 111 N.E.3d 1191 (Baldwin-Nazarene v. Aramark Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baldwin-Nazarene v. Aramark Corp., 111 N.E.3d 1191, 2018 Ohio 4650, 154 Ohio St. 3d 1429 (Ohio 2018).

Opinion

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS

Miscellaneous case. On respondents' motion to dismiss and motion to find relator a vexatious litigator. Motions granted. Yvette Barbara Baldwin-Nazarene is found to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.03(B). Baldwin-Nazarene is prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. Any request for leave shall be submitted to the clerk of this court for the court's review.

Kennedy, J., concurs in granting respondents' motion to dismiss but dissents from granting respondents' motion to find relator a vexatious litigator.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 N.E.3d 1191, 2018 Ohio 4650, 154 Ohio St. 3d 1429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-nazarene-v-aramark-corp-ohio-2018.