Baldridge v. Reilly

Arizona Supreme Court

Baldridge v. Reilly

76 P. 1124, 2 Ariz. 443, 1888 Ariz. LEXIS 25

Arizona Supreme Court·Decided May 26, 1888·No. Civil No. 227·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We think that the probate court erred in striking out that portion of defendant’s answer to the [444]*444petition for distribution wherein there was a denial of a balance in the hands of the removed administrator, Reilly, and for that reason affirm the judgment of the District Court, holding for naught the judgment of the probate court, entered March 15, 1887.

(Opinion filed May 26, 1888.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We think that the probate court erred in striking out that portion of defendant’s answer to the [444]*444petition for distribution wherein there was a denial of a balance in the hands of the removed administrator, Reilly, and for that reason affirm the judgment of the District Court, holding for naught the judgment of the probate court, entered March 15, 1887.

(Opinion filed May 26, 1888.)

Baldridge v. Reilly, 76 P. 1124, 2 Ariz. 443, 1888 Ariz. LEXIS 25 (Ark. 1888).

Pincite

76 P. 1124 (Baldridge v. Reilly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.