Baldridge v. Reilly

76 P. 1124, 2 Ariz. 443, 1888 Ariz. LEXIS 25
CourtArizona Supreme Court
DecidedMay 26, 1888
DocketCivil No. 227
StatusPublished

This text of 76 P. 1124 (Baldridge v. Reilly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baldridge v. Reilly, 76 P. 1124, 2 Ariz. 443, 1888 Ariz. LEXIS 25 (Ark. 1888).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We think that the probate court erred in striking out that portion of defendant’s answer to the [444]*444petition for distribution wherein there was a denial of a balance in the hands of the removed administrator, Reilly, and for that reason affirm the judgment of the District Court, holding for naught the judgment of the probate court, entered March 15, 1887.

(Opinion filed May 26, 1888.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 P. 1124, 2 Ariz. 443, 1888 Ariz. LEXIS 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldridge-v-reilly-ariz-1888.