Baldridge v. Horace Mann Insurance

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Baldridge v. Horace Mann Insurance

890 So. 2d 683, 4 La.App. 3 Cir. 718, 2004 La. App. LEXIS 2994, 2004 WL 2806036

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 8, 2004

DocketNo. 04-718

StatusPublished

This text of 890 So. 2d 683 (Baldridge v. Horace Mann Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baldridge v. Horace Mann Insurance, 890 So. 2d 683, 4 La.App. 3 Cir. 718, 2004 La. App. LEXIS 2994, 2004 WL 2806036 (La. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

SCOFIELD, Judge.¹

For the reasons set forth in the companion case hereto, William Anderson, et ux. v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Ins. Co. d/b/a/ Met Life Auto & Home and/or Economy Fire and Casualty Co., 04-717 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/8/2004), 890 So.2d 677, we reverse the judgment of the trial court insofar as it assesses Defendant, Mrs. Willie Mae Berryman, with 50% liability in the accident of November 25, 2002, and absolve her of any fault in the accident. Further, we find William Anderson, Jr., to be 100% at fault. The remaining issue on appeal is moot.

[684]*684All costs at the trial level, subject to the terms of the dismissals, are assessed against William Anderson, Jr., and Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company d/b/a/ Met Life Auto & Home and/or Economy Fire and Casualty Company. All costs of this appeal are assessed against appellee, William Anderson, Jr.

REVERSED AND RENDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCOFIELD, Judge.¹

For the reasons set forth in the companion case hereto, William Anderson, et ux. v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Ins. Co. d/b/a/ Met Life Auto & Home and/or Economy Fire and Casualty Co., 04-717 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/8/2004), 890 So.2d 677, we reverse the judgment of the trial court insofar as it assesses Defendant, Mrs. Willie Mae Berryman, with 50% liability in the accident of November 25, 2002, and absolve her of any fault in the accident. Further, we find William Anderson, Jr., to be 100% at fault. The remaining issue on appeal is moot.

[684]*684All costs at the trial level, subject to the terms of the dismissals, are assessed against William Anderson, Jr., and Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company d/b/a/ Met Life Auto & Home and/or Economy Fire and Casualty Company. All costs of this appeal are assessed against appellee, William Anderson, Jr.

REVERSED AND RENDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

890 So. 2d 683, 4 La.App. 3 Cir. 718, 2004 La. App. LEXIS 2994, 2004 WL 2806036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldridge-v-horace-mann-insurance-lactapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack