Baldridge v. Gordon
24 Tex. 288
Opinion
There is evidence on both sides, sufficient to authorize the jury to find a verdict either way. It is a case of conflict in the evidence, to be determined by the jury. There is no deficiency of testimony to support the verdict. If credited by the jury, notwithstanding the effort to disprove it by adverse evidence, it was amply sufficient to sustain their verdict. Under such circumstances, the verdict will not be disturbed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baldridge v. Gordon, 24 Tex. 288 (Tex. 1859).
24 Tex. 288 (Baldridge v. Gordon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fort Worth Mut. Benev. Ass'n v. Petty
293 S.W. 290 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Harrington Overton v. Chambers
143 S.W. 662 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hayward
30 S.W. 1049 (Texas Supreme Court, 1895)
Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Johnson
31 S.W. 255 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1895)
Wood v. Samuels
1 White & W. 519 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1880)
McCartney v. Martin
1 Posey 143 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1880)
Vance v. Saathoff
2 Posey 658 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1879)
Faulkner v. Warren
1 White & W. 362 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1878)
Robinson v. Davenport
40 Tex. 333 (Texas Supreme Court, 1874)
Powell v. Haley
28 Tex. 52 (Texas Supreme Court, 1866)