Baldino v. Long Island Rail Road

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baldino v. Long Island Rail Road

216 A.D.2d 262, 627 N.Y.S.2d 766, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5990

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 5, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), dated January 18, 1994, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We reject the defendant’s contention that the plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact as to whether the defendant had constructive notice of the allegedly defective stairway which caused the plaintiff’s injuries. To constitute constructive notice, a defect must be visible and apparent and it must exist for a sufficient length of time prior to the accident to permit a defendant or his employee to discover and remedy it. The plaintiff provided an affidavit from an expert who examined both the stairway and the photographs and concluded that the defective condition existed for a substantial period of time prior to the accident. Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), dated January 18, 1994, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We reject the defendant’s contention that the plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact as to whether the defendant had constructive notice of the allegedly defective stairway which caused the plaintiff’s injuries. To constitute constructive notice, a defect must be visible and apparent and it must exist for a sufficient length of time prior to the accident to permit a defendant or his employee to discover and remedy it. The plaintiff provided an affidavit from an expert who examined both the stairway and the photographs and concluded that the defective condition existed for a substantial period of time prior to the accident. Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Baldino v. Long Island Rail Road, 216 A.D.2d 262, 627 N.Y.S.2d 766, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5990 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

216 A.D.2d 262 (Baldino v. Long Island Rail Road) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related