Baldini v. Fiorica

492 A.2d 1263, 1985 Me. LEXIS 722
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedMay 24, 1985
StatusPublished

This text of 492 A.2d 1263 (Baldini v. Fiorica) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baldini v. Fiorica, 492 A.2d 1263, 1985 Me. LEXIS 722 (Me. 1985).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Alleging fraud and breach of contract in connection with the sale of the principal asset of a closely-held corporation, the plaintiffs sought approval of attachments and trustee process against property of the defendants. M.R.Civ.P. 4A, 4B. The Superior Court, Cumberland County, denied the motion. We review only for clear error or the abuse of discretion, DiPietro v. Casco Northern Bank, 490 A.2d 215, 218 (Me., 1985); Bowman v. Dussault, 425 A.2d 1325, 1328 (Me.1981), and we find none here.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowman v. Dussault
425 A.2d 1325 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1981)
DiPietro v. Casco Northern Bank
490 A.2d 215 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
492 A.2d 1263, 1985 Me. LEXIS 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldini-v-fiorica-me-1985.