Baldini v. Fiorica

492 A.2d 1263, 1985 Me. LEXIS 722
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided May 24, 1985·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Alleging fraud and breach of contract in connection with the sale of the principal asset of a closely-held corporation, the plaintiffs sought approval of attachments and trustee process against property of the defendants. M.R.Civ.P. 4A, 4B. The Superior Court, Cumberland County, denied the motion. We review only for clear error or the abuse of discretion, DiPietro v. Casco Northern Bank, 490 A.2d 215, 218 (Me., 1985); Bowman v. Dussault, 425 A.2d 1325, 1328 (Me.1981), and we find none here.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldini v. Fiorica, 492 A.2d 1263, 1985 Me. LEXIS 722 (Me. 1985).

492 A.2d 1263 (Baldini v. Fiorica) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowman v. Dussault
425 A.2d 1325 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1981)
DiPietro v. Casco Northern Bank
490 A.2d 215 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1985)