Baldini v. Fiorica
This text of 492 A.2d 1263 (Baldini v. Fiorica) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Alleging fraud and breach of contract in connection with the sale of the principal asset of a closely-held corporation, the plaintiffs sought approval of attachments and trustee process against property of the defendants. M.R.Civ.P. 4A, 4B. The Superior Court, Cumberland County, denied the motion. We review only for clear error or the abuse of discretion, DiPietro v. Casco Northern Bank, 490 A.2d 215, 218 (Me., 1985); Bowman v. Dussault, 425 A.2d 1325, 1328 (Me.1981), and we find none here.
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
492 A.2d 1263, 1985 Me. LEXIS 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldini-v-fiorica-me-1985.