Home/New York Court of Appeals/Baldine v. Gomulka

Baldine v. Gomulka

381 N.E.2d 606, 45 N.Y.2d 818, 409 N.Y.S.2d 208, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2238
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 14, 1978
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 381 N.E.2d 606 (Baldine v. Gomulka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baldine v. Gomulka, 381 N.E.2d 606, 45 N.Y.2d 818, 409 N.Y.S.2d 208, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2238 (N.Y. 1978).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (Matter of Toro v Malcolm, 42 NY2d 822; Matter of Steele v Board of Educ., 40 NY2d 846; Matter of Clayton v Board of Educ., 40 NY2d 842) and, since it was not entered in a "proceeding”, does not come within the special class of nonfinal orders appealable by permission of the Court of Appeals under CPLR [819]*8195602 (subd [a], par 2) (Grace Co. v State Univ. Constr. Fund, 41 NY2d 943; Regenbogen v Rent Stabilization Assn. of N. Y. C., 31 NY2d 668; Ofenloch v Gaynor, 28 NY2d 806).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Corp v. Alexander
92 A.D.2d 430 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
381 N.E.2d 606, 45 N.Y.2d 818, 409 N.Y.S.2d 208, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldine-v-gomulka-ny-1978.