Balderman v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Balderman v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

84 N.Y.S. 1118

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 84 N.Y.S. 1118 (Balderman v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Balderman v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co., 84 N.Y.S. 1118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

BLANCHARD, J.

We do not think the verdict is grossly against the weight of evidence, nor even that it preponderates in favor of the defendant. The case was fairly submitted to the jury by the learned trial court, and the jury resolved the conflict in the evidence in favor of the plaintiff. As there is evidence to sustain the verdict, we do not think it should be disturbed. The judgment and order must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLANCHARD, J.

We do not think the verdict is grossly against the weight of evidence, nor even that it preponderates in favor of the defendant. The case was fairly submitted to the jury by the learned trial court, and the jury resolved the conflict in the evidence in favor of the plaintiff. As there is evidence to sustain the verdict, we do not think it should be disturbed. The judgment and order must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 N.Y.S. 1118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balderman-v-metropolitan-street-railway-co-nyappterm-1903.