Baldeo v. United States

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK □□□ cence mn ne neenenneneeenenene ALBERT JAIRAM BALDEO, : Petitioner, : : ORDER - against - : : 13 Cr. 125 (PAC) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : 17 Civ. 1692 (PAC) Respondent. : ene eee nnnnenne KK HONORABLE PAUL A. CROTTY, United States District Judge: On January 25, 2022, the Court issued an opinion and order denying Petitioner Baideo’s petition for a writ of error coram nobis and related claims. ECF No. 71.' Baldeo appealed that order but failed to request a Certificate of Appealability from this Court. ECF No. 72. The Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability. Baldeo has not made a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” Yu v. United States, No. 07 CR 611 WHP, 2013 WL 1180426, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 13, 2013). “[T]here can be no debate among reasonable jurists that Petitioner was not entitled to coram nobis relief.” Mutino v. United States, No. 04-CR-0876(JS), 2019 WL 4015156, at *7 (E.D.N-Y. Aug. 23, 2019).

Dated: New York, New York SO ORDERED December 19, 2022 Olaf □ | ei PAUL A. CROTTY / United States District Judge

! All entries refer to those docketed under Case No. 17 Civ. 1692.