Baldemar Pena Hernandez v. Intercam Casa De Cambio, S.A. De C v.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 25, 2009·No. 04-09-00639-CV·Published

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00639-CV

Baldemar Pena HERNANDEZ, Appellant

v.

INTERCAM CASA DE CAMBIO, S.A. DE C.V., Appellee

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2007-CVQ-000150-D2 Honorable Raul Vasquez, Judge Presiding

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 25, 2009

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

On October 8, 2009, the trial court clerk filed a notice of late record, stating that the clerk’s

record was not filed because appellant had failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee

for preparing the record and that appellant was not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. We

subsequently ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court that either: (1) the clerk’s fee

has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to 04-09-00639-CV

appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. We cautioned appellant that if he failed to respond within the

time provided, his appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX . R. APP . P. 37.3(b).

Appellant has not filed a response to our order, and the clerk’s record has not been filed. We

therefore order this appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldemar Pena Hernandez v. Intercam Casa De Cambio, S.A. De C v., (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Baldemar Pena Hernandez v. Intercam Casa De Cambio, S.A. De C v. (Baldemar Pena Hernandez v. Intercam Casa De Cambio, S.A. De C v.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.