Baldemar Olivares Jimenez v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: April 14, 2003
• Docket: 07-02-00531-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

NO. 07-02-0531-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

APRIL 14, 2003

______________________________

BALDEMAR OLIVARES JIMENEZ, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 251^ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 13,525-C; HONORABLE PATRICK A. PIRTLE, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., and BOYD, S.J. ⁽¹⁾

On October 22, 2002, appellant Baldemar Olivares Jimenez was found guilty of the offense of delivery of a controlled substance in an amount of four grams or more but less than 200 grams. His punishment was assessed at ten years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and a fine of $2,000. He gave timely notice of appeal from his conviction.

We have now received appellant's motion to be allowed to withdraw his notice of appeal and to dismiss the appeal. His attorney has joined in the motion. Because appellant's motion meets all the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and this court has not delivered its decision prior to receiving appellant's motion, it is hereby granted.

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motions for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

John T. Boyd

Senior Justice

Do not publish.

1.

John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2003).

align: justify; line-height: 0.416667in">          Appellant, Amado Flores, filed a pro se Notice of Appeal to appeal a judgment of revocation and sentence entered against him in the 287^th District Court of Bailey County, Texas. However, appellant has now filed a motion to dismiss his appeal.

          Because the motion meets the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and this Court has not delivered its decision prior to receiving it, the motion is hereby granted and the appeal is dismissed. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue.

                                                                           Mackey K. Hancock

                                                                                      Justice

Do not publish.