Balde v. Smith

5 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 11, 1845 N.Y. LEXIS 345
New York Court of Chancery·Decided May 6, 1845·Published

Opinion

Decided that an accord without satisfaction — as for example, an agreement to receive property in part payment of a judgment, and an endorsed note for the balance — is not a discharge of the judgment, so as to prevent the filing of a creditor’s bill and the appointment of a receiver.

Decided also, that an offer by a defendant in a judgment to turn out to the sheriff sufficient property to satisfy the execution, is no defence to the appointment of a receiver upon a creditor’s bill; as the defendant has his remedy against the sheriff, if he makes a ialse return.

Usual order of reference to a master in the county of Sara-toga to appoint a receiver.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balde v. Smith, 5 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 11, 1845 N.Y. LEXIS 345 (N.Y. 1845).

5 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 11 (Balde v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.