Baldasare v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Baldasare v. State

363 So. 2d 612, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16513

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 25, 1978

DocketNo. 78-1262

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 363 So. 2d 612 (Baldasare v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baldasare v. State, 363 So. 2d 612, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16513 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find'that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error; therefore the judgment appealed is affirmed.

The only point which merits discussion is the discrepancy between the trial judge’s oral findings on revoking Baldasare’s probation, and the written revocation order. The order states that Baldasare violated Conditions H and L of his probation. Yet the judge only found that Condition L had been violated and the evidence was directed solely toward the violation of that condition.

The cause is therefore remanded for the purpose of striking the words “Condition (H)” from the Order of Revocation of Probation, otherwise affirmed.

Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

GRIMES, C. J., and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI