Baldanza v. Baldanza

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Baldanza v. Baldanza

160 A. 564, 110 N.J. Eq. 656, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 830

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 16, 1932·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for a divorce in this case was filed by Harry Baldanza against his wife, Josephine Baldanza, on the ground of adultery. There was a decree granting the prayer of the petition from which the defendant appeals.

Our examination of the proofs convinces us that the charge was sustained by the great preponderance of the evidence and that the decree was a proper one. It is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekeb, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskibe:, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petition for a divorce in this case was filed by Harry Baldanza against his wife, Josephine Baldanza, on the ground of adultery. There was a decree granting the prayer of the petition from which the defendant appeals.

Our examination of the proofs convinces us that the charge was sustained by the great preponderance of the evidence and that the decree was a proper one. It is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekeb, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskibe:, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Baldanza v. Baldanza, 160 A. 564, 110 N.J. Eq. 656, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 830 (N.J. 1932).

Pincite

160 A. 564 (Baldanza v. Baldanza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.