Baldanza v. Baldanza

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Baldanza v. Baldanza

160 A. 564, 110 N.J. Eq. 656, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 830

DecidedMay 16, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 160 A. 564 (Baldanza v. Baldanza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baldanza v. Baldanza, 160 A. 564, 110 N.J. Eq. 656, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 830 (N.J. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for a divorce in this case was filed by Harry Baldanza against his wife, Josephine Baldanza, on the ground of adultery. There was a decree granting the prayer of the petition from which the defendant appeals.

Our examination of the proofs convinces us that the charge was sustained by the great preponderance of the evidence and that the decree was a proper one. It is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekeb, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskibe:, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petition for a divorce in this case was filed by Harry Baldanza against his wife, Josephine Baldanza, on the ground of adultery. There was a decree granting the prayer of the petition from which the defendant appeals.

Our examination of the proofs convinces us that the charge was sustained by the great preponderance of the evidence and that the decree was a proper one. It is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekeb, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskibe:, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 A. 564, 110 N.J. Eq. 656, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldanza-v-baldanza-nj-1932.