Bald Mountain Portland Cement Co. v. McGuirk

92 S.E. 761, 20 Ga. App. 152, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 760
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 7, 1917
Docket8266
StatusPublished

This text of 92 S.E. 761 (Bald Mountain Portland Cement Co. v. McGuirk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bald Mountain Portland Cement Co. v. McGuirk, 92 S.E. 761, 20 Ga. App. 152, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 760 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

It not appearing that the court abused its discretion in the first grant of a new trial, and that the law and the facts required the verdict directed, the judgment granting the motion for a new trial

must be

Affirmed.

Jenkins and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 S.E. 761, 20 Ga. App. 152, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bald-mountain-portland-cement-co-v-mcguirk-gactapp-1917.