Balcom v. Richards

60 Mass. 360, 6 Allen 360
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1850·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Dewey, J.

The ruling of the court of common pleas, that a payment, made by one of two defendants upon the note before it was barred by the statute of limitations, prevented the statute from running against both, and that it was not important for the jury to consider, whether Jesse F. Richards admitted that the payment was made by himself or Calvin Richards, was erroneous. This subject was fully considered by this court in the case of Peirce v. Tobey, 5 Met. 168, 171, and that decision must govern the present case.

Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balcom v. Richards, 60 Mass. 360, 6 Allen 360 (Mass. 1850).

60 Mass. 360 (Balcom v. Richards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. New Orleans Canal & Banking Co. v. Heard
47 L.R.A. 512 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1895)