Balcom v. McQuesten

17 A. 638, 65 N.H. 81
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1888·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Blodgett, J.

The second and third counts in the plaintiff’s declaration stating no cause of action, the demurrer to them was rightly sustained; and as the plaintiff’s unexecuted license from Fletcher constitutes his only title to the ice cut, carried away, and converted to their own use by the defendants, no recovery can be had under the first count, for want of title. Licenses do not pass aby title until they are executed or enjoyed, and then only to the extent to which they are executed or enjoyed.

Judgment for the defendants,.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balcom v. McQuesten, 17 A. 638, 65 N.H. 81 (N.H. 1888).

17 A. 638 (Balcom v. McQuesten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Abbott v. Cremer
95 N.W. 387 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1903)