Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Balck v. Fast, Md

Balck v. Fast, Md

254 S.W.3d 114, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 391
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 25, 2008
DocketWD 67377
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 254 S.W.3d 114 (Balck v. Fast, Md) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Balck v. Fast, Md, 254 S.W.3d 114, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 391 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert E. Fast, M.D. and St. Joseph OB-GYN, Inc. appeal from the judgment following a jury trial in favor of Kimberly Black in the amount of $223,000 in her medical malpractice action. Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we find that the judgment is supported by the evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

YOLE v. State
254 S.W.3d 114 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 S.W.3d 114, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balck-v-fast-md-moctapp-2008.