Balck v. Fast, Md

Missouri Court of Appeals

Balck v. Fast, Md

254 S.W.3d 114, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 391

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 25, 2008·No. WD 67377·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert E. Fast, M.D. and St. Joseph OB-GYN, Inc. appeal from the judgment following a jury trial in favor of Kimberly Black in the amount of $223,000 in her medical malpractice action. Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we find that the judgment is supported by the evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert E. Fast, M.D. and St. Joseph OB-GYN, Inc. appeal from the judgment following a jury trial in favor of Kimberly Black in the amount of $223,000 in her medical malpractice action. Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we find that the judgment is supported by the evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Balck v. Fast, Md, 254 S.W.3d 114, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 391 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

254 S.W.3d 114 (Balck v. Fast, Md) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related