Balch v. O'Brien

154 A. 398, 108 N.J. Eq. 212, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 488
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 24, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 154 A. 398 (Balch v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Balch v. O'Brien, 154 A. 398, 108 N.J. Eq. 212, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 488 (N.J. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a decree of the court of chancery confirming the report of one of the special masters of that court approving the final report and account of the receiver of the Oakland Lumber Company, and fixing the allowance of the special master, the receiver and his counsel.

The exceptions to the receiver’s report and account are dated subsequent to the decree allowing the account and ordering distribution. This irregularity would be sufficient to preclude our considering the matter.

Our examination, however, of the questions argued leads us to believe that the receiver in a proper and lawful manner conducted the business of the corporation, and that services *213 for which the allowances were made were rendered, and there is nothing presented to us that leads us to believe that the allowances were excessive. In fact, they seem to have been reasonable.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 A. 398, 108 N.J. Eq. 212, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balch-v-obrien-nj-1931.