Balch v. Carling

29 S.E. 146, 102 Ga. 586, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 633
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 27, 1897·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

This being an action by a tenant against a landlord for personal injuries alleged to have been occasioned by the defendant’s failure to keep in proper and safe repair a certain veranda-railing, and the question of the plaintiff’s right to recover being dependent upon whether or not he was guilty of negligence in putting the railing to an improper use by sitting upon it, and the evidence for the plaintiff affirmatively showing that he was in this respect negligent, and might by the exercise of . ordinary care have avoided the injuries, there was no error in granting a nonsuit. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balch v. Carling, 29 S.E. 146, 102 Ga. 586, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 633 (Ga. 1897).

29 S.E. 146 (Balch v. Carling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griffith v. Morgan
160 S.E.2d 420 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Hornsby v. Haverty Furniture Co.
69 S.E.2d 630 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Culbreath v. Kutz Co.
140 S.E. 419 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Pamler v. Byrd
131 Ill. App. 495 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1907)
Knowles v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
45 S.E. 605 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)