Balcerak v. County of Nassau

257 A.D.2d 658, 684 N.Y.S.2d 565, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 616
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 25, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 257 A.D.2d 658 (Balcerak v. County of Nassau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Balcerak v. County of Nassau, 257 A.D.2d 658, 684 N.Y.S.2d 565, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 616 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent County of Nassau which denied the petitioner’s application for benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-c, the County of Nassau appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.), dated December 15,1997, as granted renewal, and, upon renewal, granted the petition to the extent of directing the respondent to pay General Municipal Law § 207-c benefits retroactive to June 14, 1996, credit the petitioner for leave entitlements he used and would have earned, and reimburse him for all health insurance premiums he incurred that should have been paid by the respondent.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The petitioner, a correction officer, was injured in an automobile accident after completing a special assignment at North Shore University Hospital and was awarded Workers’ Compensation benefits. The appellant, however, subsequently denied the petitioner’s application for benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c on the ground that he was not [659]*659injured in the performance of his duties (see, General Municipal Law § 207-c [1]).

The Supreme Court properly granted the petition and directed payment of the statutory benefits. The court correctly concluded that the appellant was bound by the prior decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, which necessarily determined that the petitioner’s injuries occurred while performing his duties (see, Matter of De John v Town of Frankfort, 209 AD2d 938; Matter of Fedorczak v Dolce, 202 AD2d 668; Matter of Maresco v Rozzi, 162 AD2d 534; Matter of Crawford v Sheriffs Dept., 152 AD2d 382). Santucci, J. P., Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Balcerak v. County of Nassau
274 A.D.2d 580 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 A.D.2d 658, 684 N.Y.S.2d 565, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balcerak-v-county-of-nassau-nyappdiv-1999.