Balastrieri v. Davis

236 A.D.2d 348, 654 N.Y.S.2d 325, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1050

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ingrassia, J.), entered February 8, 1996, which, upon a jury verdict, was in favor of the defendants and against him dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The jury verdict was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Vadala v Carroll, 91 AD2d 865, affd 59 NY2d 751).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Florio, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balastrieri v. Davis, 236 A.D.2d 348, 654 N.Y.S.2d 325, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1050 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

236 A.D.2d 348 (Balastrieri v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vadala v. Carroll
450 N.E.2d 238 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Vadala v. Carroll
91 A.D.2d 865 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)