Balas v. Balas

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Balas v. Balas

541 So. 2d 1365, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1062, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2277, 1989 WL 41174

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Balas v. Balas. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 Fla. L. Weekly 679 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 28, 1989·No. No. 88-02063·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order that appellant’s visitation rights be suspended. We conclude that the order did not fail to comply with this court’s mandate in Balas v. Balas, 521 So.2d 343 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). We anticipate that the trial court will be cognizant of any future development justifying reinstatement of visitation.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and LEHAN and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order that appellant’s visitation rights be suspended. We conclude that the order did not fail to comply with this court’s mandate in Balas v. Balas, 521 So.2d 343 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). We anticipate that the trial court will be cognizant of any future development justifying reinstatement of visitation.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and LEHAN and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Balas v. Balas, 541 So. 2d 1365, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1062, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2277, 1989 WL 41174 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

541 So. 2d 1365 (Balas v. Balas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related