Balas-Bratton v. Husted

5 N.E.3d 662, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1443
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 19, 2014·No. 2014-0374·Published

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition involving an expedited election matter.

Upon consideration of the motion of George T. Maier for leave to intervene as respondent, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Intervening respondent’s brief and evidence are due on the same date that respondents’ briefs and evidence are due.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balas-Bratton v. Husted, 5 N.E.3d 662, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1443 (Ohio 2014).

5 N.E.3d 662 (Balas-Bratton v. Husted) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.