Balas-Bratton v. Husted

Ohio Supreme Court

Balas-Bratton v. Husted

5 N.E.3d 662, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1443

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 19, 2014

Docket2014-0374

StatusPublished

This text of 5 N.E.3d 662 (Balas-Bratton v. Husted) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Balas-Bratton v. Husted, 5 N.E.3d 662, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1443 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition involving an expedited election matter.

Upon consideration of the motion of George T. Maier for leave to intervene as respondent, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Intervening respondent’s brief and evidence are due on the same date that respondents’ briefs and evidence are due.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition involving an expedited election matter.

Upon consideration of the motion of George T. Maier for leave to intervene as respondent, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Intervening respondent’s brief and evidence are due on the same date that respondents’ briefs and evidence are due.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 N.E.3d 662, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balas-bratton-v-husted-ohio-2014.