Balarin v. Allstate Insurance Company

481 So. 2d 1263, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 184
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 14, 1986·No. 85-1607·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

481 So.2d 1263 (1986)

Olga Orloff BALARIN and Jorge Balarin, Appellants,
v.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation, Appellee.

No. 85-1607.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

January 14, 1986.
Rehearing Denied February 19, 1986.

Magill & Lewis, Miami, for appellants.

Spencer & Taylor, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The final order dismissing the instant complaint to compel arbitration is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to reinstate the said complaint. We reach this result for the following briefly stated reasons.

First, in a suit by an insured, as here, to compel arbitration on an underinsured motorist claim against one of two underinsured motorist carriers, it is not required that the insured also join the second underinsured motorist carrier as a necessary party to the suit. Second, the trial court, accordingly, committed reversible error in dismissing the instant suit when the insureds refused to amend the complaint herein to add the second of two underinsured motorist carriers as a party to this suit and stood on their complaint brought against only one of their underinsured motorist carriers. See State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Glass, 421 So.2d 759, 761 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); O'Donnell v. Chamberlain, 372 So.2d 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); § 682.03(1), Fla. Stat. (1983).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balarin v. Allstate Insurance Company, 481 So. 2d 1263, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 184 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

481 So. 2d 1263 (Balarin v. Allstate Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Holcomb
481 So. 2d 1263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)