Balan v. Tesla Motors Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided April 27, 2022·No. 2:19-cv-00067·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE CRISTINA BALAN, CASE NO. C19-67 MJP Plaintiff, ORDER RE-NOTING MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD v. Defendant. This matter is before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiff’s motion to vacate the arbitration award was noted for consideration on April 1, 2022. (Dkt. No. 83.) However, in its motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s motion, Defendant challenges the Court’s jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 87.) That motion is noted for April 8. Because the Court must address jurisdiction as a predicate issue, Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83, 94–95 (1998), Plaintiff’s motion to vacate is re-noted for consideration on April 8. The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to Plaintiff and all counsel. Dated April 27, 2022. A

Marsha J. Pechman United States Senior District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balan v. Tesla Motors Inc, (W.D. Wash. 2022).

Balan v. Tesla Motors Inc (Balan v. Tesla Motors Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment
523 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1998)