Balal Services Trust v. Stacey

644 F. App'x 279
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 13, 2016·No. No. 15-2135·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Stacey, Sr., appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion for default judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Balal Servs. Tr. v. Stacey, No. 1:15-cv-00046-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2015); see Fed.R.Civ.P. 55; 28 U.S.C. § 3304(b)(1)(A), (B) (2012); N.C. Gen.Stat. § 39-23.4 (2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balal Services Trust v. Stacey, 644 F. App'x 279 (4th Cir. 2016).

644 F. App'x 279 (Balal Services Trust v. Stacey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related