Balal Services Trust v. Stacey

644 F. App'x 279
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 13, 2016
DocketNo. 15-2135
StatusPublished

This text of 644 F. App'x 279 (Balal Services Trust v. Stacey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Balal Services Trust v. Stacey, 644 F. App'x 279 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Stacey, Sr., appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion for default judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Balal Servs. Tr. v. Stacey, No. 1:15-cv-00046-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2015); see Fed.R.Civ.P. 55; 28 U.S.C. § 3304(b)(1)(A), (B) (2012); N.C. Gen.Stat. § 39-23.4 (2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
644 F. App'x 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balal-services-trust-v-stacey-ca4-2016.