Balal Services Trust v. Stacey
This text of 644 F. App'x 279 (Balal Services Trust v. Stacey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
William Stacey, Sr., appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion for default judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Balal Servs. Tr. v. Stacey, No. 1:15-cv-00046-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2015); see Fed.R.Civ.P. 55; 28 U.S.C. § 3304(b)(1)(A), (B) (2012); N.C. Gen.Stat. § 39-23.4 (2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
644 F. App'x 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balal-services-trust-v-stacey-ca4-2016.