Balahoutis v. Urbanism Group, LLC

884 So. 2d 514, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14991, 2004 WL 2290622
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 13, 2004·No. No. 3D03-2802·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Nicolas Balahoutis appeals the trial court’s final judgment awarding attorneys’ fees. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in failing to specify the number of hours and the hourly rate it used in calculating the attorneys’ fee award.

[515]*515Although, there is competent evidence to support the award of attorneys’ fees, it is well established that the trial court is required to set forth specific findings regarding the number of hours expended, the hourly rate and the appropriateness of the reduction or enhancement factors. Florida Patient’s Comp. Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985).

Accordingly, we reverse the attorney’s fee award and remand to the trial court for the purpose of making the necessary findings. We affirm as to the remaining issues. See Dade County School Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So.2d 638 (Fla.1999); Saussy v. Saussy, 560 So.2d 1385 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balahoutis v. Urbanism Group, LLC, 884 So. 2d 514, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14991, 2004 WL 2290622 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

884 So. 2d 514 (Balahoutis v. Urbanism Group, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dade Cty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA
731 So. 2d 638 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Saussy v. Saussy
560 So. 2d 1385 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe
472 So. 2d 1145 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)