Bakter v. Mimmo

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Bakter v. Mimmo

196 Misc. 245, 91 N.Y.S.2d 423, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2609

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJuly 14, 1949

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 196 Misc. 245 (Bakter v. Mimmo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bakter v. Mimmo, 196 Misc. 245, 91 N.Y.S.2d 423, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2609 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As shown by the certificate of occupancy, and as provided by New York City Charter (§ 646 and subdivisions) and the provisions of Administrative Code of the City of New York (§ C26-181.0 et seq.; § C26-184.0 et seq.), the partition by the tenant of the jewelry store and the converting of the rear portion thereof into a dwelling (Multiple Dwelling Law, § 4, subd. 4) and his occupancy thereof as such dwelling constituted an illegal use (47 East 74th St. Corp. v. Simon, 188 Misc. 885; Wack v. Boutin, 81 N. Y. S. 2d 281), and furnished grounds for recovery by landlord of possession under Business Rent Law (§ 8, par. [b], cl. [2] ; L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.). The proceeding being based upon such section, notice to cure the defect was not required (Fifth Avenue Equities, Inc., v. Kriesberg, 80 N. Y. S. 2d 455).

The final order to extent appealed from by landlord should be reversed, with $30 costs and final order directed in favor of landlord as prayed for in the petition, with costs. Appeal by tenant dismissed.

Hammer, Hoestadter and Eder, JJ., concur.

Pinal order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

As shown by the certificate of occupancy, and as provided by New York City Charter (§ 646 and subdivisions) and the provisions of Administrative Code of the City of New York (§ C26-181.0 et seq.; § C26-184.0 et seq.), the partition by the tenant of the jewelry store and the converting of the rear portion thereof into a dwelling (Multiple Dwelling Law, § 4, subd. 4) and his occupancy thereof as such dwelling constituted an illegal use (47 East 74th St. Corp. v. Simon, 188 Misc. 885; Wack v. Boutin, 81 N. Y. S. 2d 281), and furnished grounds for recovery by landlord of possession under Business Rent Law (§ 8, par. [b], cl. [2] ; L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.). The proceeding being based upon such section, notice to cure the defect was not required (Fifth Avenue Equities, Inc., v. Kriesberg, 80 N. Y. S. 2d 455).

The final order to extent appealed from by landlord should be reversed, with $30 costs and final order directed in favor of landlord as prayed for in the petition, with costs. Appeal by tenant dismissed.

Hammer, Hoestadter and Eder, JJ., concur.

Pinal order reversed, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 Misc. 245, 91 N.Y.S.2d 423, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bakter-v-mimmo-nyappterm-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack