Bakst v. Lauer
194 A.D.2d 338, 598 N.Y.S.2d 954
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (C. Beauchamp Ciparick, J.), entered December 8, 1992, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for partial summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Issues of fact exist whether the substituted notes discharged appellant’s obligation on the guarantee by significantly modifying the terms of the note (Reiss & Son v Silver Colt Realty Assocs., 184 AD2d 205), and how the irregular interest payments were to be applied. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bakst v. Lauer, 194 A.D.2d 338, 598 N.Y.S.2d 954 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).
194 A.D.2d 338 (Bakst v. Lauer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
I. Reiss & Son v. Silver Colt Realty Associates
184 A.D.2d 205 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)