Bakst v. Lauer

194 A.D.2d 338, 598 N.Y.S.2d 954

This text of 194 A.D.2d 338 (Bakst v. Lauer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bakst v. Lauer, 194 A.D.2d 338, 598 N.Y.S.2d 954 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (C. Beauchamp Ciparick, J.), entered December 8, 1992, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for partial summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Issues of fact exist whether the substituted notes discharged appellant’s obligation on the guarantee by significantly modifying the terms of the note (Reiss & Son v Silver Colt Realty Assocs., 184 AD2d 205), and how the irregular interest payments were to be applied. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

I. Reiss & Son v. Silver Colt Realty Associates
184 A.D.2d 205 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 A.D.2d 338, 598 N.Y.S.2d 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bakst-v-lauer-nyappdiv-1993.