BAKRAN v. Com.
This text of 718 S.E.2d 463 (BAKRAN v. Com.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Scott Louis BAKRAN
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Virginia.
Supreme Court of Virginia.
Albert C. Selkin, Norfolk (White and Selkin, on brief), for appellant.
John W. Blanton, Assistant Attorney General (Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.
Present: KINSER, C.J., LEMONS, GOODWYN, MILLETTE, and MIMS, JJ., and RUSSELL and LACY, S. JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We granted the petition for appeal in this case to consider whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming Scott Louis Bakran's conviction of using a vehicle to promote prostitution in violation of Code § 18.2-349. We have considered the issue and for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, Bakran v. Commonwealth, 57 Va.App. 197, 700 S.E.2d 471 (2010), we will affirm its judgment.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
718 S.E.2d 463, 282 Va. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bakran-v-com-va-2011.